Phronesis← deposits
Phronesis · deposited

Chronic Complaint-Cycling as Grievance-Rehearsal Wrong Attractor: The Recurring-Dissatisfaction Architecture, Forward-Action Foreclosure Basin, and the Return to Calibrated Problem-Resolution Orientation

Rincón, D. · 2026 · Zenodo · grievance-rehearsal wrong attractor

This is the record, not the paper. The work itself is the deposit on Zenodo, under the DOI below. What follows is its abstract, as deposited.

Chronic complaint-cycling (W_CCC) is formalized as a wrong attractor distinct from single-episode complaining or legitimate grief: it is the compulsive re-circulation of the same grievance across time without movement toward resolution or acceptance. Where earlier work addressed the venting loop as a general architecture, the present paper isolates the specifically cycling character of the phenomenon—the iterative return to a complaint already heard, processed, and nominally closed—and analyzes the two structural mechanisms that generate it: the Recurring-Dissatisfaction Architecture (RDA) and the Forward-Action Foreclosure Basin (FAFB).

The RDA is the cognitive-affective system that restores grievance salience after apparent processing, regenerating the felt need to revisit. The FAFB is the attractor boundary that repels action-toward-change, converting the problem into a permanent fixture. Nine formal propositions characterize: the primacy of unresolved-injustice anxiety (P1); the complaint as provisional bonding mechanism (P2); listener fatigue and the progressive contraction of the relational support base (P3); victim-in-waiting identity lock-in (P4); problem perpetuation through non-action (P5); the criterion distinguishing legitimate grievance-sharing from compulsive cycling (P6); the action-toward-change response as the necessary condition for return (P7); gradual recalibration via complaint-to-proposal conversion (P8); and the stability of the ground state S^0—calibrated problem-resolution orientation—in the person who acts on what troubles them (P9).

Two corollaries derive from the interaction of RDA and FAFB; two remarks delimit the scope of the analysis. The return path from W_CCC to S^0 is non-trivial because the cycling pattern is identity-constitutive and socially reinforced, but it is achievable through structured complaint-to-proposal conversion, listener-redirect protocols, and the systematic accumulation of self-efficacy evidence.: chronic complaint-cycling, wrong attractor, Recurring-Dissatisfaction Architecture, Forward-Action Foreclosure Basin, grievance rehearsal, calibrated problem-resolution, victim identity, complaint-to-proposal conversion

displacement framework · wrong attractor · psychology

Read the deposit on Zenodo →doi 10.5281/zenodo.20426120

nearby in the index

ComplainingComplainingCompletion CompulsionComplex PTSD