Phronesis← deposits
Phronesis · deposited

Chronic Conversational Topic-Hijacking as Self-Relevance-Filter Wrong Attractor: The Associative-Disinhibition Architecture, Witnessed-Experience Deficit Basin, and the Return to Calibrated Relational Presence

Rincón, D. · 2026 · Zenodo · self-relevance-filter wrong attractor

This is the record, not the paper. The work itself is the deposit on Zenodo, under the DOI below. What follows is its abstract, as deposited.

Chronic conversational topic-hijacking (W_CCTH) is formalized within the displacement framework as a presence-seizure wrong attractor: a stable but dysfunctional relational basin in which a person compulsively redirects any incoming conversational topic back to themselves. The pathology is not clinical narcissism, simple self-absorption, or performative dominance—it is organized around an automatic associative process in which whatever the other person is talking about triggers a self-relevant connection that immediately displaces the original topic.

The hijack is typically experienced not as a redirect but as natural conversational flow; the self-centering is invisible from the inside. We identify three interlocking sustaining mechanisms: (1) self-relevance-as-engagement-criterion, the implicit belief that one can only genuinely contribute to a conversation about something if it relates to personal experience, such that other-focused topics feel like territory where one has nothing to offer; (2) other-topic-as-exclusion, the phenomenological experience of the other person's topic as the conversation excluding the self rather than as the conversation being about something, such that the redirect restores a sense of relational belonging; and (3) associative-disinhibition, the failure of inhibitory circuits to intercept the automatic path from other-topic to self-relevant topic before the redirect is already underway.

These mechanisms jointly generate the Topic-Hijacking Paradox: conversational self-centering organized to establish connection systematically prevents it, because the other person experiences their experience as unwitnessed, and gradually withdraws the genuine engagement that the self-centering is organized to secure. The ground state S^0 is calibrated conversational reciprocity: the capacity to hold space for another person's topic through its natural completion, contributing from genuine interest rather than self-relevance, without systematic self-centering.

Displacement accumulation under W_CCTH operates along three pathways: within-conversation topic compression, cross-conversation relational thinning, and the non-development of genuine other-directed attention. Return paths include associative-inhibition training, phenomenological reorientation toward other-experience as interesting-in-itself, and Internal Family Systems work on the part organized around self-relevance-as-inclusion.

Nine formal propositions structure the analysis.: topic-hijacking, wrong attractor, displacement framework, self-centering, conversational reciprocity, associative-disinhibition, Topic-Hijacking Paradox, other-topic intolerance, empathy

displacement framework · wrong attractor · psychology

Read the deposit on Zenodo →doi 10.5281/zenodo.20421361

nearby in the index

ContrarianismConversational DigressionCookingCorrection