Phronesis← deposits
Phronesis · deposited

Compulsive Multitasking as Parallel-Presence Wrong Attractor: The Attention-Fragmentation Architecture, Task-Switching Basin, and the Return to Calibrated Focused Engagement

Rincón, D. · 2026 · Zenodo · parallel-presence wrong attractor

This is the record, not the paper. The work itself is the deposit on Zenodo, under the DOI below. What follows is its abstract, as deposited.

The capacity for sustained, calibrated focus — the ability to direct attention toward a single task when depth is required, and to divide it across tasks only when those tasks genuinely permit parallel processing — constitutes a foundational competency of productive and present psychological life. This paper formalizes the chronic absence of that capacity as a wrong attractor W_ CCM within the displacement framework.

The person living in W_ CCM compulsively divides attention across multiple simultaneous tasks not because the tasks require it but because single-task focus has become intolerable: concentration on one thing produces an experience of constriction, boredom, or low-grade anxiety that the opening of another task immediately relieves. We designate the healthy ground state S^0 as calibrated focus: flexible attentional deployment that can sustain single-task concentration when depth is needed and appropriately divide attention when tasks genuinely permit it.

Three interlocking mechanisms sustain the wrong attractor: single-task intolerance, in which the narrowing of attention produces discomfort and the impulse to open another task provides relief; the productivity-theater belief, in which the implicit equation between appearing busy across multiple streams and being productive makes single-task work feel invisible or wasteful; and cognitive-load-as-presence, in which the feeling of being fully alive depends on attentional overload, so that stillness and depth feel like absence rather than presence.

Nine formal propositions articulate the attractor's structure and its basin-maintenance dynamics. The paper introduces and proves the Multitasking Paradox: compulsive multitasking that feels like enhanced productivity and presence systematically reduces the quality of both, because human attention does not divide — it switches rapidly between tasks, paying a switching cost each time, producing work that is broader and shallower than either task demanded.

Empirical grounding draws on cognitive psychology research on task-switching, executive-control costs, and the neuroscience of focused attention. The ground state S^0 — calibrated focus — is not the poverty of doing one thing; it is access to the only attentional state in which depth, flow, and genuine cognitive presence become possible.

displacement framework · wrong attractor · psychology

Read the deposit on Zenodo →doi 10.5281/zenodo.20421360

nearby in the index

Multiple SclerosisMultitaskingMusical MasteryMyalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome