White fragility — the pattern of defensive emotional and behavioral responses triggered in white individuals by racial stress — is here formally reconceptualized as a wrong attractor W_WF in the landscape of racial accountability and learning. The healthy ground state S^0 is defined as racial accountability engagement: the capacity to receive feedback about racial dynamics, tolerate the discomfort of racial learning, and remain present to anti-racist work without collapsing into self-protective fragility.
W_WF arises because low racial stress tolerance, reinforced by a lifetime of racial insulation, means any racial discomfort exceeds the individual's distress tolerance; the defensive response (denial, anger, withdrawal, appeals for absolution) terminates the discomfort but forecloses learning and re-establishes the attractor. Nine formal propositions characterize DiAngelo's socialization model, the centering mechanism, performative allyship as a W_WF variant, the distinction from white guilt, and return paths through tolerance building, accountability structures, and community of practice.
Phronesis