phronesis · integrated coherence model
Dialogue
Two people, read side by side. It reports four separate facts about how they relate — and keeps them separate, because which one is wrong is what decides what you do next.
There is deliberately no coupling score. Two people sharing every word at opposite displacements, and two people equally settled but talking about different things, would land in the same place on any single number — and they need opposite responses.
first speaker
second speaker
four facts, kept apart
A displacement gap of 60. One of you is much further from ground than the other — this is the moment for the steadier one to hold, not to match.
each read on its own
first
flow · moderate · grounded 40
unspecified
flow: move ignite: move
second
flow · low · grounded 100
embodied
flow: move ignite: move
What it is not: it does not read minds, and it is not a clinical instrument. It reads two pieces of text with the same deterministic engine and reports how the readings relate. An earlier version of this was to be built on a live weather field whose hub was destroyed in August; none of that is here, because a measurement that depends on a dead service is not a measurement.
coherence monitor · logic engine · the engine, and what it is not